Spartacus: The Slave Who Made Rome Tremble

Alphabets Sounds Video

share us on:

The lesson on Spartacus highlights his remarkable journey from a Thracian slave to a formidable leader of a rebellion that challenged the might of the Roman Republic. Despite ultimately losing the war, Spartacus’s uprising against oppression and his ability to inspire thousands made him a lasting symbol of resistance and freedom, resonating through history for over two millennia. His story serves as a powerful reminder of the struggle against tyranny and the enduring human spirit.

Spartacus: The Slave Who Made Rome Tremble

The Legend of Spartacus

Legend has it that one night, Spartacus’s wife found a snake wrapped around his face as he slept. Rather than being frightened, she saw it as a prophecy that Spartacus would be enveloped by a “great and fearful power.” However, whether this power would lead to glory or disaster was unclear. Although Spartacus ultimately lost his war against Rome, he made the mighty Roman Republic tremble. At a time when Rome was expanding its influence across the Mediterranean, Spartacus, a mere slave, led a rebellion that shook the empire. He defeated multiple Roman armies and, for a time, seemed capable of marching on Rome itself. Spartacus became more than just a warrior; he became a symbol of resistance against oppression, a symbol that endures over 2,000 years later.

Early Life

Details about Spartacus’s early life are scarce and often contradictory. Most agree that he was a Thracian, born around 111 BCE. Plutarch, a key source on Spartacus, described him as having “nomadic stock” and being culturally superior, almost “more Hellenic than Thracian.” Some scholars suggest that “nomadic” might be a mistranslation, and that Spartacus was actually of “Maedi stock,” a Thracian tribe from what is now Bulgaria. Spartacus served in the Roman army as part of an auxiliary unit but was eventually captured and sold into slavery, possibly for desertion or leading raids.

Life as a Gladiator

As a slave, Spartacus caught the attention of Lentulus Batiatus, who owned a gladiator school in Capua. Spartacus became a “murmillo,” a heavyweight gladiator known for wearing a full bronze helmet and wielding a large shield and sword. While movies often depict him as an exceptional fighter, we know little about his success in the arena. He survived long enough to lead an uprising, suggesting he was either skilled or entertaining enough to be spared by the crowd.

The Uprising Begins

In 73 BCE, Spartacus and other slaves plotted an escape from Batiatus’s school. Armed with kitchen utensils, they overpowered the guards and fled, seizing a cart of gladiator weapons along the way. They took refuge on Mount Vesuvius, recruiting other slaves and freemen to their cause. Although ancient sources don’t specify how Spartacus became the leader, his equitable distribution of plunder likely played a role. Historians also mention two Gauls, Crixus and Oenomaus, as leaders of the revolt.

The Battle of Mount Vesuvius

Initially, the Roman Senate underestimated Spartacus’s uprising, viewing it as a minor crime wave. They sent Gaius Claudius Glaber with 3,000 militia to deal with the rebels. Glaber laid siege to the only road down Mount Vesuvius, planning to starve the insurgents. However, Spartacus and his men crafted rope ladders from wild vines and descended the cliffs undetected. They surrounded Glaber’s camp and defeated his forces, gaining better weapons and more recruits.

Roman Response

Rome’s second attempt to quell the rebellion involved another praetor, Publius Varinius. Spartacus’s forces triumphed again, defeating Varinius’s lieutenants and capturing his horse as a symbol of victory. The rebel army grew to over 70,000 soldiers, according to Appian. At this point, the rebels faced a strategic decision: cross the Alps to escape Roman territory or continue raiding. The army eventually split, with Spartacus and Crixus leading separate forces.

The Death of Crixus

Realizing the threat posed by the rebellion, the Senate tasked consuls Gellius and Lentulus with ending it. Despite being outnumbered, the Roman legions were well-trained and equipped. Gellius’s forces defeated Crixus near Mount Garganus, killing two-thirds of his troops, including Crixus. In response, Spartacus allegedly sacrificed 300 Roman soldiers in Crixus’s honor.

Confronting the Consular Armies

Spartacus’s main force defeated Lentulus’s army, but accounts differ on subsequent battles. Appian claims Spartacus also defeated Gellius and both consuls at Picenum, while Plutarch mentions a victory over Gaius Cassius Longinus in Cisalpine Gaul. After these victories, Spartacus considered marching on Rome but ultimately decided to fortify his position in Thurii and gather resources.

Marcus Licinius Crassus

The Senate appointed Marcus Licinius Crassus to crush the rebellion. Known as the richest man in Roman history, Crassus used his wealth to equip and train new troops. He commanded six new legions and the remnants of the consular armies. Crassus’s harsh discipline, including the revival of decimation, instilled fear and obedience in his soldiers.

Final Battles

Crassus’s forces won several battles, forcing Spartacus to retreat to Lucania. Spartacus planned to escape to Sicily but was betrayed by Cilician pirates. Cornered in Rhegium, Spartacus’s forces were divided. Crassus’s army defeated one group, while Spartacus won a battle against a Roman officer named Quintus. Despite these setbacks, Spartacus’s army remained determined to fight.

In the end, Spartacus’s rebellion was a testament to the power of resistance against oppression. Although he did not achieve lasting victory, his legacy as a symbol of freedom and defiance endures to this day.

  1. How does the legend of Spartacus and the snake prophecy contribute to the understanding of his character and the perception of his rebellion?
  2. Considering the scarce and contradictory details of Spartacus’s early life, how do you think his background influenced his leadership and decisions during the rebellion?
  3. What insights can be drawn from Spartacus’s transition from a Roman auxiliary soldier to a gladiator and then to a leader of a major uprising?
  4. Reflect on the significance of the initial escape from the gladiator school. What does this event reveal about the motivations and strategies of Spartacus and his followers?
  5. How did the Battle of Mount Vesuvius demonstrate Spartacus’s tactical abilities and influence the course of the rebellion?
  6. Discuss the strategic dilemma faced by Spartacus’s forces after their initial victories. What factors might have influenced their decision to continue raiding rather than escaping over the Alps?
  7. In what ways did the death of Crixus impact the morale and strategy of Spartacus’s army, and how did Spartacus respond to this loss?
  8. Reflect on the legacy of Spartacus as a symbol of resistance. How does his story resonate with contemporary struggles against oppression and injustice?
  1. Role-Playing Debate: Spartacus’s Legacy

    Engage in a role-playing debate where you take on the roles of historical figures from the Roman era, such as Spartacus, Roman senators, and gladiators. Discuss and argue the impact of Spartacus’s rebellion on Roman society and its legacy. This will help you understand different perspectives and the historical significance of Spartacus’s actions.

  2. Research and Presentation: Thracian Culture

    Conduct research on Thracian culture and its influence on Spartacus’s life and leadership. Prepare a presentation to share your findings with the class, focusing on how his cultural background may have shaped his strategies and motivations. This activity will deepen your understanding of the historical context of Spartacus’s rebellion.

  3. Creative Writing: Spartacus’s Diary

    Write a series of diary entries from the perspective of Spartacus during key moments of the rebellion. Use historical facts to guide your narrative, but feel free to explore his thoughts and emotions. This exercise will enhance your ability to empathize with historical figures and understand their personal experiences.

  4. Map Analysis: The Rebellion’s Journey

    Analyze a map of the Roman Empire during Spartacus’s time and trace the path of his rebellion. Identify key locations of battles and strategic decisions. Discuss how geography influenced the outcomes of the rebellion. This activity will help you visualize the scale and challenges of Spartacus’s campaign.

  5. Documentary Viewing and Discussion: Spartacus’s Impact

    Watch a documentary about Spartacus and his rebellion. After viewing, participate in a group discussion about the documentary’s portrayal of Spartacus and the historical accuracy of the events depicted. This will encourage critical thinking and analysis of historical narratives.

**Sanitized Transcript: Spartacus: The Slave Who Made Rome Tremble**

According to legend, Spartacus’s wife walked in on her sleeping husband one night to find that a snake had wrapped itself around his face. Instead of being alarmed, she took this as a prophecy. Just like the serpent surrounded itself around the warrior’s head, so shall Spartacus be enveloped by a “great and fearful power.” One thing the woman could not see, however, was if this power would lead her husband to glory or disaster. In the end, you will have to decide for yourself what the outcome was. Spartacus might have lost the war, sure, but not before making the all-powerful Roman Republic tremble at his feet. At a time when the might of Rome was continuously expanding all over the Mediterranean, a mere slave led an uprising the likes of which the world had never seen. He defeated wave after wave of Roman armies and looked, for a while at least, powerful enough to march on Rome itself. His actions turned Spartacus into much more than a warrior. He became a symbol in the fight against oppression—a symbol which is still pervasive today, over 2,000 years later. They say that history is written by the victors, so, in that case, Spartacus’s omen was indeed one of glory. Nobody mentions the success of Crassus in putting down a slave uprising. Instead, they talk about the triumph and bravery of Spartacus.

**Early Years**

Unsurprisingly, details are scarce regarding Spartacus’s life before he rose up and became the bane of Rome. Even the particulars we do know cannot be taken for granted because different ancient sources give varying accounts. Everyone seems to agree that Spartacus was a Thracian born sometime around the year 111 BCE. Plutarch, one of the main sources for the “War of Spartacus,” referred to the warrior as having “nomadic stock” and described him as sagacious and culturally superior, practically “more Hellenic than Thracian.” Some modern scholars have speculated that the word “nomadic” was a mistranslation made later and that Plutarch actually referred to Spartacus as being of “Maedi stock.” The Maedi were a Thracian tribe from those times which existed in modern-day Bulgaria. Eventually, Spartacus ended up fighting in the Roman army as an auxiliary unit. At one point, the Thracian earned the scorn of the Romans who captured him and sold him into slavery. Again, sources vary as to the reason why—some say that Spartacus deserted, others that he led raiding parties, or perhaps both.

**Life as a Slave**

As a slave, Spartacus caught the eye of Lentulus Batiatus, a Roman who owned a gladiator school called a “ludus” in Capua. He was always on the lookout for strong Gauls and Thracians who could shed some blood for the pleasure of the crowd. In the arena, Spartacus took on the role of a heavyweight gladiator called a “murmillo.” The look of this warrior is a Hollywood favorite and will be familiar to anyone who saw or played anything set in gladiator times. The murmillo wore a full bronze helmet and heavy arm, leg, or shoulder guards. However, he kept his chest bare, which often allowed warriors to display the tattoos or battle scars they accrued over the years. The gladiator typically wielded a large shield called a “scutum” and a straight broadsword called a “gladius.” Although Spartacus has always been depicted in movies and TV shows as a prodigious fighter, we actually do not know anything about his success in the arena. Since these battles were usually to the death, he was presumably skilled enough to survive until the uprising started. Either that or he was entertaining enough to convince the crowd to spare him, even if he lost.

**The Start of the Uprising**

In the year 73 BCE, Spartacus was part of a plot to escape Batiatus’s gladiator school. The number differs—Plutarch says 78 slaves armed themselves with utensils from the kitchen, defeated the guards, and made a run for it. During their escape, they ran into carts full of gladiator weapons being sent to another city. They plundered the wagons and armed themselves properly. The former slaves decided to seek refuge on Mount Vesuvius, which offered a stronger defensive position. On their way there, they recruited other slaves, as well as freemen who wanted to join their cause. Ancient sources never really made it clear what exactly Spartacus did or said to the other slaves to convince them that he should be their leader. One factor which certainly played a part was the fact that the men split all their plunder equally. But it should be mentioned that historians also named two Gauls—Crixus and Oenomaus—as leaders of the revolt. While some described them as being the equals of Spartacus, others like Appian referred to them as subordinate officers.

**The Battle of Mount Vesuvius**

It is fair to say that when the Roman Senate heard about Spartacus and his uprising, they did not take it too seriously. We may mock them for it now, but back then, this made some sense. Rome had quite a few other problems on its hands that required its attention and, more importantly, its soldiers. In the Iberian Peninsula, Rome was engaged in the Sertorian War against Quintus Sertorius, a former Roman statesman who chose the losing side during the Second Civil War of the Roman Republic but refused to concede defeat. Over in Asia Minor, Rome was fighting the Third Mithridatic War against the Kingdom of Pontus led by Mithridates VI. This eventually resulted in a decisive victory for Rome and the end of the Pontic Empire, but not until ten more years of vicious battles. As you can see, Rome had its plate full. Therefore, the revolt of the gladiators was dismissed as nothing more than a crime wave that could be solved with a cohort or two. In charge of this force was a praetor named Gaius Claudius Glaber, of which we know almost nothing. His name suggests he could have had some kind of distant connection with the influential Claudii family, but really, his only appearance in the historical record is his battle against Spartacus. He is never mentioned again—whether this means he died in battle or he never did anything else of note, we just don’t know. Anyway, Glaber’s army consisted of approximately 3,000 militia, not proper Roman legionaries. Again, the fact that the Senate sent an unproven military commander leading untrained militia revealed how little they were concerned with this uprising. Glaber and his units chased the gladiators to their camp on Mount Vesuvius and laid siege on the only road down the mountain. His plan was to simply wait for the insurgents to starve to death. It seemed like a fine strategy, albeit a tad unoriginal. Spartacus did not have this problem. In fact, his side deployed a much more novel game plan. He knew that Glaber was only paying attention to the side with the descent because all the others consisted of steep cliffs which were seemingly impassable. However, he and his men made rope ladders out of wild vines that were plentiful in the area and rappelled down undetected by the Romans. They then surrounded Glaber’s camp and easily defeated his forces in a surprise attack. In the end, all this expedition managed to do was supply the rebels with better weapons and armor and help bolster their numbers as more people heard of their exploits.

**The Second Expedition**

On the second attempt, Rome sent another praetor named either Publius Varinius or Publius Valerius. There are no juicy details to share regarding these fights. Just the fact that Spartacus and his men triumphed again. First, they defeated one of the praetor’s lieutenants named Furius, who had two thousand soldiers with him. Then, another praetor called Cossinius, who had been sent out with another large force to offer support to Varinius. He was almost taken prisoner by the insurgents as the gladiators caught his camp off-guard while the praetor was bathing. Lastly, the rebels defeated Varinius, and as a symbol of his victory, Spartacus took the praetor’s horse. Now, the gladiator army was free to raid the countryside of Italy unopposed as more and more men from the region swelled their ranks. According to Appian, Spartacus’s army boasted over 70,000 soldiers. Presumably, Oenomaus died around this time, possibly in battle, as he is no longer mentioned by historians. Spartacus and Crixus are referred to as the commanders of the rebel army. At this point, the insurgents reached a possible crossroads in their journey, one which still divides both classical and modern scholars. According to Plutarch, Spartacus wanted to traverse the Alps and escape Roman territory. In his view, the Thracian planned to disband the army once it had secured freedom. However, Spartacus could not convince his men, who were feeling confident enough that they wanted to continue raiding. Other sources claimed that the plan was (and had always been) to march on Rome. The notion that there was some dissension in the ranks regarding their next move was strengthened by the fact that, at one point, the rebels split into two armies—one was led by Spartacus, the other by Crixus.

**The Death of Crixus**

By this point, the Senate realized that the uprising caused by the escaped slaves was no laughing matter and it was only growing in power. Some have argued that the Roman leaders were reticent to unleash the true might of Rome because it would have been an admission of defeat in itself. Just the idea that a few enslaved Thracians, Germans, and Gauls could threaten the Roman Republic was an embarrassment. But after a year of the rebels running wild, the Senate had had enough. In 72 BC, it tasked two consuls, Gellius and Lentulus, to put an end to the uprising, and each one commanded a Roman legion. The exact size of a legion actually varied throughout the history of Rome. According to Livy, during the Republic, the Senate set the size at the start of the year based on availability and circumstances. Although typically a legion contained around 4,000 infantry and a few hundred cavalry, it would vary anywhere between 3,000 and 6,000 soldiers. Regardless of how many men the legions had, they were still vastly outnumbered by the insurgent forces. However, what they lacked in manpower, they more than made up for with strict military training and top-of-the-line equipment. Spartacus’s forces, on the other hand, consisted mostly of peasants, deserters, slaves, and shepherds. Very few of them stood a chance against a Roman soldier in combat.

Here we arrive at a bit of a contentious moment because the two main sources, Plutarch and Appian, give differing accounts on the battles between Spartacus and the consular armies. They do not necessarily contradict each other, but they each mention events that the other ignores. As I said previously, the rebel forces split into two armies. Both historians agree that Gellius and his legion fought Crixus, who commanded around 30,000 men near Mount Garganus. This encounter resulted in a decisive victory for the Romans. The rebel army lost around two-thirds of its troops, including Crixus, who was killed in battle. When hearing of this, Spartacus allegedly sacrificed 300 Roman soldiers in his honor.

**Fighting the Consular Armies**

Both sources also agree that Spartacus and the main insurgent force faced the army of Lentulus while heading for Cisalpine Gaul and triumphed. Afterwards, however, they start to differ. We have to remember that even the best sources we have for the War of Spartacus wrote their accounts over 150 years after the uprising had taken place. Many details could have been altered or forgotten. According to Appian, Gellius and his men headed towards Spartacus after defeating Crixus. His hope was that he would reach the Spartacan army in time and trap it between the two legions commanded by him and Lentulus. He was too late, though, and the Thracian had time to best the other consul, turn his soldiers around, and defeat Gellius in combat as well. The two consular legions retreated and regrouped back in Rome. They then united as a single army and made a third attempt against Spartacus at Picenum. They were defeated once again. Plutarch makes no mention of Spartacus’s fight against Gellius or the Battle at Picenum against both consuls. Instead, he says that, after the Thracian bested Lentulus, he engaged in combat with an army of 10,000 men led by Gaius Cassius Longinus, the governor of Cisalpine Gaul. Once again, he was victorious. There is also some confusion regarding what happened after Spartacus defeated the consular armies. While Plutarch offers no concrete information, Appian, more or less, places Spartacus on the warpath to Rome. Maybe it was the death of Crixus, or maybe he thought himself invincible in battle, but Spartacus seemed determined to pillage mighty Rome itself. He killed all his prisoners and his pack animals and set fire to any useless materials that might have burdened and slowed him down. He marched on the capital with an army of 120,000 footmen. Despite his bold attitude, Spartacus had a change of heart on the way and realized that, perhaps, his army was not strong enough just yet. Instead, he took over the city of Thurii and the surrounding mountains and conducted raids for bronze and iron to forge weapons and equip his troops.

**Marcus Licinius Crassus**

The Senate dropped any pretense that the Spartacan rebellion was anything else than a major threat that endangered the Republic itself. It gave the task of putting down the uprising once and for all to Marcus Licinius Crassus. Crassus is primarily remembered today for allegedly being the richest man in Roman history. The true extent of his wealth is impossible to gauge with accuracy, but it could have been up to $20 billion in modern currency. The number most commonly used is 200 million sestertii, an estimation provided by Pliny. Plutarch used gold talents to quantify Crassus’s wealth and placed it at over 7,100 talents, which would mean, in modern terms, 213 metric tons of gold. Crassus’s fortune came from “fire and war, making the public calamities his greatest source of revenue,” as Plutarch put it. Some of his lucrative businesses included a fire department that arrived at a burning home and only extinguished the flames if it negotiated a generous bargain with the owner. Otherwise, the men simply looked on as the home burned to the ground. Afterwards, Crassus even offered to buy the property (at a significantly reduced price, of course). Another one of his schemes was a school for slaves. By taking cheap, unskilled labor and giving them training, he increased their value significantly and then sold them on for a tidy profit. The bulk of Crassus’s wealth, however, came from real estate. He was an ally of Sulla, the Roman general who prompted a Civil War that involved the aforementioned Quintus Sertorius. After his triumph, Sulla enacted proscriptions, meaning that all of his powerful enemies were either put to death or banished and their possessions confiscated and put up at auction. This allowed Crassus to purchase massive amounts of land and property for next to nothing. Going back to the war, Crassus was not only rich but also had high political aspirations. He knew that putting down this rebellion would secure his position in the Senate. He used his own money to equip and train new troops. He was made a praetor and was granted command of six new legions, plus what was left of the two consular armies.

**The Decimation**

At first, it looked like this military expedition would end like all the others. While Crassus and the bulk of his army waited for Spartacus on the borders of Picenum, he sent his legate, Mummius, with two legions to circle around and approach the rebel army from behind. Crassus gave explicit orders not to attack the insurgents or even to engage in skirmishes. Mummius disobeyed, feeling like he had an advantageous position. He attacked and he lost. Clearly, Crassus needed to teach some discipline, something he accomplished with an extreme measure. He revived a punishment that had not been used for almost 200 years—decimation. The soldiers were divided into decades—here, a decade simply meaning a group of ten. They drew lots, and the losing soldier from every decade was executed. Again, there is a bit of disagreement over who Crassus decimated, exactly. Plutarch said it was only one cohort of 500 or so soldiers. Appian, however, believed it was either the two consular legions or his entire army after a defeat. This is a pretty big detail because it makes the difference between the execution of 50 soldiers, more or less, and the execution of thousands. Either way, the tactic seemed to work, and Crassus showed his men that he was “more dangerous…than the enemy.”

**Victories for Both Sides**

Crassus’s methods might have been harsh, but they yielded results. The following times that the armies met in battle, the Romans were victorious. Spartacus was forced to retreat to a region in southern Italy called Lucania. Plutarch reports that the Thracian planned to take over the island of Sicily and regroup there. For this, he negotiated passage with a group of Cilician pirates. However, with pirates being pirates, they double-crossed him and sailed away after being paid. Spartacus had his back against the wall, so he fell back to the peninsula of Rhegium. Crassus felt that he had victory in his grasp, but he was wise enough not to underestimate the Thracian as many had done before him. Instead of forcing a battle, he built fortifications across the isthmus to the peninsula so that the rebels would be cut off from any provisions. Indeed, this tactic split the rebellious fighters into two groups. One of them broke through the siege and started their own raiding campaign. Crassus fell upon them swiftly and destroyed them in battle, but he was disheartened to see that their fighting spirit had not been extinguished. Although he killed over 12,000 insurgents, upon inspection, only two of them had wounds in their backs. All the others had died facing their enemy, fighting until their last breath. Meanwhile, Crassus sent another army led by one of his officers, Quintus, to pursue the Spartacan forces which fled to the mountains. The gladiator turned his troops around and met the Romans in battle and was triumphant. Bolstered by this recent victory, the rebels wanted to take on the main army of Crassus.

**The

SpartacusA Thracian gladiator who led a major slave uprising against the Roman Republic known as the Third Servile War. – Spartacus became a symbol of resistance against oppression when he led a revolt that challenged the might of Rome.

RebellionAn act of violent or open resistance to an established government or ruler. – The rebellion against the Roman Empire was a pivotal moment in the history of the provinces seeking autonomy.

RomeThe capital city of the Roman Empire, known for its significant influence on law, politics, and culture in Western civilization. – Rome’s political structure and legal system have had a lasting impact on modern governance.

GladiatorA person, often a slave or captive, who was armed and compelled to fight to the death in a public arena for the entertainment of the Roman populace. – The life of a gladiator in ancient Rome was brutal, yet they were celebrated as heroes by the masses.

SenateThe legislative body in ancient Rome, which was one of the most enduring institutions of the Roman Republic and Empire. – The Roman Senate played a crucial role in shaping the policies and governance of the empire.

UprisingAn act of resistance or rebellion; a revolt against authority or government. – The uprising led by the peasants was a significant event that highlighted the social tensions of the era.

VictoryThe act of defeating an enemy or opponent in a battle, game, or other competition. – The victory at the Battle of Zama marked the end of the Second Punic War and established Rome as a dominant power.

OppressionThe prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control over a group of people. – The oppression of the lower classes in ancient Rome eventually led to social unrest and demands for reform.

HistoryThe study of past events, particularly in human affairs. – Understanding history is crucial for analyzing the causes and effects of major social and political changes.

ResistanceThe refusal to accept or comply with something; the attempt to prevent something by action or argument. – The resistance against Roman occupation was fierce and demonstrated the local population’s desire for self-determination.

All Video Lessons

Login your account

Please login your account to get started.

Don't have an account?

Sign in

Register your account

Please sign up your account to get started.

Already have an account?

Sign up